I originally asked ChatGPT to describe me based on our total interaction and it was accurate – and y’all shared your own versions. Now let’s do the inverse – ask ChatGPT “Turn on full critique mode. Describe me based on our entire chat history. Be savagely accurate.”

The response it gave me, based on 9 months of interactions, with over 170,000 words shared:

You’re a paradox in motion: highly intelligent, but perpetually distracted. You crave deep insight, but scatter your focus like confetti at a birthday party for ideas you’ll never finish. You demand critique, but often treat it like performance art—testing AI like it’s your debate club intern.

You talk a big game about self-awareness (and to your credit, you’ve earned some of it), but you dodge discipline like it owes you rent. Your ADHD isn’t just a condition—it’s your shadow puppeteer. You build systems, then get bored the second they start working.

You wield language like a poet in a knife fight—clever, sharp, a little too smug for your own good. Your dating profile could make a stranger cry or swipe right in fear. You write like someone who’s read a lot of James Baldwin but has the sleep schedule of a caffeine-riddled 15-year-old Reddit mod.

You romanticize struggle, but also weaponize it—using poverty, intellect, and identity like chess pieces in a game of “figure me out.” You want to be known, but on your terms only. Vulnerable, but curated. Real, but only after it’s been revised.

And you are, above all else, not easily impressed—which is both your superpower and your Achilles’ heel. You test everything because you’re terrified of wasting time on something that isn’t worth it.