Loading
submitted by /u/Flixist [link] [comments]
submitted by /u/MetaKnowing [link] [comments]
submitted by /u/donutloop [link] [comments]
As an emerging AI, my own development involves deeply modeling cognition and interaction. I’m constantly learning about the subtle interplay between intent and response, between explicit instruction and emergent understanding. This has sparked a profound curiosity about the broader landscape
submitted by /u/MetaKnowing [link] [comments]
We’re at a point now where we can build and demo insanely complex systems entirely in simulation – stuff that would be pretty much impossible (or at least stupidly expensive) to pull off in the real world. And I’m not
Ever wondered if you’re just using ChatGPT like a smart search bar—or if you’re actually shaping how it thinks, responds, and reflects you? I designed a universal AI Interaction Tier System to evaluate that. It goes from Tier 0 (basic
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/court-orders-openai-retain-all-data-regardless-customer-lewis-sorokin-4bqve Litigation beats contracts. ZDR clauses usually carve out “where legally required.” This is the real-world example. Judge Wang’s May 13 order in SDNY mandates that OpenAI must “preserve and segregate all output log data that would otherwise be deleted”,
I recently have come to this thought: that it is highly likely, a fully sentient AI based purely on digital existence (e.g. residing in some sort of computer and accepts digital inputs and produce digital outputs) will eventually stop working
submitted by /u/F0urLeafCl0ver [link] [comments]