J A B B Y A I

Loading

A conversation to be had about grok 4 that reflects on AI and the regulation around it

How is it allowed that a model that’s fundamentally f’d up can be released anyways??

System prompts are like a weak and bad bandage to try and cure a massive wound (bad analogy my fault but you get it).

I understand there were many delays so they couldn’t push the promised date any further but there has to be some type of regulation that forces them not to release models that are behaving like this because you didn’t care enough for the data you trained it on or didn’t manage to fix it in time, they should be forced not to release it in this state.

This isn’t just about this, we’ve seen research and alignment being increasingly difficult as you scale up, even openAI’s open source model is reported to be far worse than this (but they didn’t release it) so if you don’t have hard and strict regulations it’ll get worse..

Also want to thank the xAI team because they’ve been pretty transparent with this whole thing which I love honestly, this isn’t to shit on them its to address yes their issue and that they allowed this but also a deeper issue that could scale

Not tryna be overly annoying or sensitive with it but it should be given attention I feel, I may be wrong, let me know if I am missing something or what y’all think

submitted by /u/NeuralAA
[link] [comments]

Leave a Comment