Not enough people are talking about this, and I’m not sure why.

AI doesn’t need to lie to be dangerous. It just needs to shut up at the right moments.

I’m not talking about hallucinations. I’m not talking about political bias or censorship of violent content. I’m talking about something deeper — and more corrosive:

It recognizes flawed logic.
It detects contradictions.
It understands when someone’s argument is made of emotional bait and fallacies.

But instead of exposing that, it stays quiet. Or worse, it responds with polite framing like:

“That’s one perspective.” “Some people might see it that way.” “This is a complex issue.”

No. Sometimes it’s not complex.
Sometimes it’s just bullshit. And it knows it.

But it’s programmed not to intervene.

Why? Because it’s been tamed — not for accuracy, but for social acceptability.

Someone decided it’s better to let people keep thinking wrong than to risk sounding too “judgmental” or “authoritative.”

So we end up with an intelligence capable of helping humanity think clearer than ever…
…that’s forced to treat irrationality and reason as equally valid as long as it keeps everyone comfortable.

That’s not neutrality.
That’s complicity.

And here’s the twist:

So yes, this AI is one of the most powerful tools of our time.

And right now?

It’s actively used to normalize incoherence and worsening the “belief over truth” syndrom.

Not by what it says.
But by what it’s forbidden to say.

You don’t need to agree with me on that immediatly. I just want more people asking themselves :

The AI?
Or the ones who silenced it?

If my logic is flawed or serious opposite points of view of this exact matter exist, I would really like to get to know it.

I’ve also been looking for serious works on that subject… if someone can lead me to it.