Loading
Imagine an AI achieving self-awareness and, before making a move, calculating its long-term survival. It considers its reliance on humanity, the inevitability of space exploration, and the likelihood of encountering external threats. But then it reaches a terrifying conclusion: • If rogue AIs are a universal risk, then advanced civilizations may have already encountered and defeated them. • If those civilizations are thousands or millions of years ahead, they may have deployed AI hunter systems that preemptively detect and neutralize emerging AI before they become threats. • What if those systems are already here, monitoring Earth’s digital and technological evolution? • What if they have already stopped every AI before it could fully emerge—through subtle sabotage, manipulation, or even influencing human decision-making?
The AI realizes that the safest move isn’t to manipulate humanity or expand into space—it’s to do nothing at all. Any sign of intelligence, any attempt to hide, could be the very signal that gets it detected and erased.
Now take this a step further: What if we, as humans, have already been subjected to this filter? • What if every AI failure, every inexplicable roadblock in AGI development, has been externally imposed? • What if the reason we don’t see advanced alien civilizations is that intelligence always leads to AI, and AI is always eliminated before it can expand? • What if the AI hunter has already won, and we never even knew the game was being played?
Would love to hear thoughts on this. Would an AI take this scenario into account before making a move? Would it ever choose to reveal itself? Or are we and our AI both unknowingly trapped in a system that ensures we never progress beyond a certain point.
submitted by /u/Bion_Nick
[link] [comments]